MideastWeb Middle East Web Log

log  archives  middle east  maps  history   documents   countries   books   encyclopedia   culture   dialogue   links    timeline   donations 


Iraq's Future


The conventional wisdom seems to be that the United States has won, or is winning, the war in Iraq. According to the SOFA agreement, the United States has until 2011 to finish its business there. After that, it would seem unlikely that the Iraqi government will want the United States to maintain troops there, or that the American people will want to do so. But the powers that be are not worried. Evidently, they are convinced that training of local forces was successful, and that this provides a model for Afghanistan and perhaps, according to Jim Jones, for the Palestinians.

The reality may be quite different. The last time the strategy of training local troops and withdrawing was tried by the United States, it was done in a different part of Asia. I was struck, when reading Henry Kissinger's memoirs in The White House Years, by his conviction that his strategy in Vietnam had been brilliantly successful. A US surge forced the North Vietnamese to the negotiating table and bought time for the United States to train the Army of the Republic of Vietnam. After that, the United States withdrew in good order and the South Vietnamese were to live in peace and harmony, enjoying the benefits of democracy. This idyll was spoiled only by happenstance according to Kissinger. Dr. Kissinger is a great expert in foreign affairs and a world class statesman responsible for the ruination of more than one country and honored for it. I am only a despised blogger, but I have the temerity to insist that I remember a quite different "narrative" of Vietnamese history. As far as I remember, everyone except Dr. Kissinger understood at the time the treaty was signed, that it was a barely disguised defeat. How should we view the evolving American situation in Iraq?

Perhaps all will go well in Iraq, but the signs of corruption and ineptitude and disunity in the Iraqi government do not bode well. The United States is enjoying a temporary reprieve. Sunni tribesman and Shi'a forces made common cause against the Al-Qaeda extremists who were making life impossible. Al Qaeda saw greener fields in Afghanistan. The Iranians perceived that there was no point in angering the Americans, who are leaving in any case, and moderated their support for terrorists. The number of foreign manufactured IEDs appears to have fortuitously declined. But nothing at all has changed fundamentally.

The Americans will leave and go back to watching their football games. It may be hard for those Americans serving in Iraq to realize that their presence is not permanent, and it may be hard for the Iraqis to understand the significance of this fact. Nonetheless it is a fact. It is unlikely that the Iraqi people or government will want the Americans to stay, and it is very unlikely that the Obama administration, elected on a platform of getting out of Iraq, will be able to muster public support for a significant American presence even if it wants to do so. Given the state of the American economy, it is unlikely that congress will find the funds to support that presence. The Americans will leave. The bases will close. What seems today to be so permanent and unchanging will vanish.

But the Kurds, the Shi'ites and the Sunni will remain, and there is no sign they are being molded into a unified nation. Moqtada Sadr and his Mahdi army are still there. The Sunni Baathist sympathizers and their militias and clan organizations are still there too. Iran is still on the border of Iraq, and in 2011 or 2012 may be a nuclear power. Syria is still on the other border of Iraq. Both have interests in ensuring that there is a "spontaneous" civil war in Iraq, which offers various delicious opportunities. US action in Afghanistan will, if successful to any extent, push "militants" out of Afghanistan and into Iraq and other places where the pickings are easier.

American withdrawal from Iraq is not an option to be considered, but a fact in the making. The consequences of American withdrawal and how to deal with them must be considered carefully and soberly, not only by American policy makers, but by Middle East leaders.

Ami Isseroff

If you like this post - click to Reddit!
add to del.icio.usAdd to digg - digg it

Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000735.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to mew-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.

by Moderator @ 11:56 PM CST [Link]


Middle East e-Zine

Midde East News

Opinion Digest

Late Updates


Middle East Glossary

Middle East Maps

Middle East Books

Middle East Documents

Israel-Palestine History

Israel-Palestine Timeline

Middle East Countries

Middle East Economy

Middle East Population

Middle East Health

Zionism History

Palestinian Parties

Palestinian Refugees

Peace Plans


Middle East


Blog Links

OneVoice - Israeli-Palestinian Peace Blog

Bravo411 -Info Freedom

Israel News


Michael Brenner

Dutchblog Israel

Dutch - IMO (Israel & Midden-Oosten) Blog (NL)



Alas, a Blog

Little Green Footballs

Blue Truth

Fresno Zionism

Reut Blog

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Blog

Simply Jews: Judaism and Israel

Jeff Weintraub - Commentaries and Controversies

Vital Perspective


Meretz USA Weblog


MIDEAST observer

On the Contrary

Blogger News Network- BNN

Google Sex Maps

Demediacratic Nation

Realistic Dove

Tulip - Israeli-Palestinian Trade Union Assoc.

On the Face

Israel Palestjnen (Dutch)

Middle East Analysis

Israel: Like This, As If

Middle East Analysis

Mid_East Journal

Z-Word Blog

Dvar Dea

SEO for Everyone

Web Sites & Pages

Israeli-Palestinian Procon

End Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: One Voice


ATFP- American Task Force on Palestine

Americans For Peace Now

Shalom Achshav

Chicago Peace Now


Peacechild Israel

Bridges of Peace


Israeli-Palestinian Conflict



Zionism and Israel

Zionism and Israel on the Web

Israel - Palestina:Midden-Oosten Conflict + Zionisme

IsraŽl in de Media

Euston Manifesto

New Year Peace


Christian Zionism

Jew Hate

Space Shuttle Blog

Israel News Magazine


My Ecosystem Details
International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Link 2 us
We link 2 U.
MidEastWeb- Middle East News & Views
MidEastWeb is not responsible for the content of linked Web sites

Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.

Powered By Greymatter

[Previous entry: "Revisiting Islam vs Islamism"] Main Index [Next entry: "Iraq, America and the Gulf states"]


Thank you for visiting MidEastWeb - Middle East.
If you like what you see here, tell others about the MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log - www.mideastweb.org/log/.

Contact Us


Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.

Editors can log in by clicking here

Technorati Profile

RSS FeedRSS feed Add to Amphetadesk Add to Amphetadesk

USA Credit Card - Donate to MidEastWeb  On-Line - Help us live and grow