MideastWeb Middle East Web Log |
log | archives | middle east | maps | history | documents | countries | books | encyclopedia | culture | dialogue | links | timeline | donations |
Search: |
|
|
Gaza: What is happening and why it is important06/14/2007 The Middle East policy of the United States is suffering an unmitigated catastrophe as I write these words. The U.S. is suffering a policy disaster that may be worse in the long run than the Iraq debacle, but apparently nobody in the state department understands this. The Palestinian national cause is likewise suffering a second Nakba, a disaster as bad or worse than that of 1948. We Israelis too, have a new threat on our southern border. The astounding thing is that nobody at all seems to care very much, and everyone goes about business as usual, as if nothing happened.
In Gaza, a relatively small force of Hamas Islamist extremists are liquidating the possibility of a two state solution and a secular Palestinian democracy. The tragedy is exemplified by two items. These are the last broadcast words of a Fatah activist, in the process of being murdered by the Haams:
"We are not Jews," said the Fatah fighter, therefore, we should not die. Palestinians, including the Fatah themselves, were so transfixed by the notion of "resistance," that they failed to understand that the Hamas guns were aimed at them, and at liquidation of the Palestinian national project. The Palestinians never internalized the idea of sovereignty and what it means, and the need to abandon genocidal projects and racism in favor of national construction. A Hamas spokesperson put it succinctly:
Indeed, the era of Islamic rule has apparently arrived, and that was goal of the Hamas.
As for justice, those who have supported "justice" for Palestine by eliminating Israel can see from the Gaza violence that Hamas "justice" entails invading hospitals, killing doctors and throwing people off the top of buildings. That is the sort of justice one may expect under Hamas rule. Here is another example of Islamic justice:
The attacks were initiated at an opportune time, when Fatah forces leader Mahmoud Dahlan was outside of Gaza undergoing medical treatment. The supposed trigger for the Hamas attack was an RPG fired at the house of Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Hanniyeh. But the attack, which came while Dahlan was away, makes no sense. The RPG was probably not going to kill Hanniyeh and the Fatah were unprepared to defend themselves or to take over the government. Was it really launched by a Fatah loyalist, or was it a manufactured provocation? The real motivation for what is happening in Gaza has nothing much to do with Palestinians or occupation. The orders come from Syria and Iran, who were never interested in a Palestinian state, and certainly not in a state that is controlled by the secular Fatah and its allies, and absolutely not a state that would be a protege of the US and the West, and that would take the Israeli-Palestinian conflict off the table. Had the US administration and the quartet roadmap plan succeeded in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Iran and Syria would have been isolated in the Arab and Muslim arena. The Saudi sponsored Arab Peace plan would perhaps become a reality, and the place for Islamist extremism and Syrian intrigues would have vanished from Middle East diplomacy. The need to maintain the Palestinian Authority in power was always recognized as a priority by the Bush administration. That is why the Israel government was not allowed to move in on the Muqata and Yasser Arafat. That is why Israel have been forced, during all the years of the Intifada, and even after the Israeli withdrawal, to supply electricity, fuel and water to the Palestinian Arabs of Gaza. The water that is drunk by the suicide bombers and the Qassam launchers and the holy dervishes of the Hamas comes from Israel. The radio stations that broadcast the blood curdling messages of murder for Jews and Fatah "traitors" are powered by Israeli generators, and the gasoline in the trucks that transport the rocket launching teams is refined in Israel. The charge that Israel is "choking" Gaza has to be viewed in the light of those facts. Israeli acquiescence in the events in Gaza was at the insistence of the United States, which also transferred quantities of arms to the Fatah in the hope that that would enable them to resist the inevitable showdown with Hamas. It cannot be imagined that different Israeli governments were enthusiastic about this policy. Ariel Sharon was not a great lover of the Palestinian people or a believer in the cause of Palestinian Arab independence. He vowed that the Gaza settlements would remain under Israeli sovereignty forever. But under pressure of the White House bulldozer, he left Mr. Arafat to survive in the Muqata and to be succeeded by Mahmoud Abbas, and then he withdrew from Gaza, evacuating his beloved settlements, the folly of Israeli nationalism. In doing so however, Sharon threw out the baby with the bathwater, because the IDF too withdrew from Gaza, ending any possibility of keeping order there and allowing a reasonable transition to responsible Palestinian government. The Hamas filled the vacuum left by the IDF. No Israeli government could agree to Mr. Abbas's terms of peace, which include return of Palestinian refugees and surrender of all of East Jerusalem, including Israeli national institutions there such as the Hebrew University on Mt Scopus, the historic Jewish quarter of the Old city and the Western (Wailing Wall). The absurd charge that Abbas and Fatah are tools of Israel, leveled by the Hamas, could only be cooked up in the feverish brains of Islamist Mullahs. But Israel had maneuvered itself into a position where it is almost totally dependent on the United States for military aid and diplomatic support. Therefore, there was no choice but to undertake disengagement, to allow the existence of the Palestinian authority even after the Hamas had taken it over, and even, for the unlucky PM Olmert, to acquiesce in daily Qassam rocket terror in Sderot, inside Green Line Israel, emanating from the previously occupied Gaza strip. It doesn't matter if U.S. policy makers are totally ignorant of Middle East reality. They have the money and the power, so their word is law. But now that their pet puppy, the one that they so wanted their parents to buy, is sick, the adolescents in Washington are not interested in taking care of it. As usual, having imposed an inappropriate solution, the DC adolescents walk away from the consequences. It is true that Israel did not oblige those who wanted it to grant more concessions in order to strengthen Mahmoud Abbas. It should have been done. It is unlikely that any such concessions would have really helped Palestinian moderates however. Every concession that Israel made was always seen as a victory for "armed resistance" and not for moderation. At the same time, every concession and every offer were always denigrated as too little, any number of prisoners offered as a confidence building gesture was considered to be a Zionist trick. The debacle in Gaza has ominous portents for others as well. The method of Hamas, was to gain legitimacy for its rule through a unity government with Fatah, and then to destroy Fatah from within so to speak. The same "unity government" proposal is now on the table in Lebanon, where the Hezbollah are seeking to take over the government, and the ultimate result may be the same in Lebanon as in Gaza: an Islamist take over. The crumbling of the Fatah looks like historical inevitability in action. Mahmoud Abbas inexplicably failed to give any orders in time. He was being true to his often repeated pledge to Palestinians that the arms supplied with American help would not be used against Palestinians. Fatah would only kill Jews. But the Hamas was obviously not making such fine distinctions. An enemy of Islam is an enemy of Islam for them. The guns supplied by the Americans were surrendered to Hamas or captured by them:
Despite overwhelming numerical superiority, Fatah forces didn't fight, because Abbas didn't give the order until it was too late, after Fatah officials threatened a revolt. He proved to be at least a worthless leader, and perhaps something worse. Essentially, the project for a Palestinian state is in ruins. Except for the Hamas, all of the participants and all of the bystanders really do not comprehend what has happened in Gaza, or what has happened to them, or what they should be doing. Israeli and American peace groups are silent, or dwell on issues like the two state solution and the Israeli separation fence, that are not top priority or are irrelevant. Israel and the United States are dithering about, trying to decide what they should do. Israel Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev had this to say about the events:
. As Charles Levinson noted, it is the understatement of the week. Ronny Shaked writes that the victory of the Hamas presages a terrible nightmare - a two-state Palestinian solution, with Hamas controlling Gaza. He is wrong. For Israel, that is actually the small nightmare. The big nightmare, far more realistic, is the one-state Palestinian solution, with Hamas controlling both Gaza and the West Bank, as well as the PLO. Syria is on its way to realizing its long term goal of liquidating the Fatah, or returning the Fatah to being a subservient offspring of Syrian intelligence, as it was before the Six Day War. Not only the Fatah, but the U.S. government, the peace groups, Christian groups, the secular Palestinian movements, the US groups that have been insisting on greater U.S. involvement in the peace process, the EU and the Israeli government - in short, just about everyone, should be mobilizing to stop the Hamas, but nobody is doing anything at all. All of the bright hopes for the future of the Palestinians are being blown out by the Hamas as a child blows out a birthday candle. The world ends not with a bang, but a whimper.
Ami Isseroff
Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000596.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to mew-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission. |
|
Replies: 7 comments
The Arabs are a bunch of brainwashed incompetent fools. Posted by ismail @ 06/15/2007 10:33 AM CST
The unfolding hell in Gaza is a bloody coda of the saga of the marxist based liberation movements. West throw them in the hands of Soviet Union and then fought them to death just to discover that they were substitued by something far more dangerous and destructive. Posted by Aleph @ 06/15/2007 01:22 PM CST What are the suggestions in the street of Isreal Ami? What should the US do? Is it better to allow Hamas to consolidate their control throughout Gaza and the West bank so that their is a clear target, or is it better to strike them now when the streets are filled with confusion? We here at home are in a situation where we are sick to death of war, though if there was a real threat to us and we had leadership in the United States that were not known to be blatent liars we may be more supportive of the mess that is happening there now. I personally think now would be the best time to get control of the situation, while Fatah still exists. It appears though that the moderate Palestinians are without any leadership what so ever. We have the same thing happening in Iraq. Weak leadership, not due so much to the weakness of the officials themselves but due to the non-willingness of the people to follow them. In a state of chaos and anarchy such as what is being seen in Gaza and the West Bank, how does a military campagin subdue the enemy and restore order to a non-existant leadership? Posted by OMFG @ 06/18/2007 11:32 PM CST Call me simple-minded, but I'm having difficulty sorting out the good guys from the bad guys in this situation. In World War II the Soviets and Nazis hated each other, but both were responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent people. In much the same way, Fatah and Hamas have much in common, but are fighting each other. None of these are good guys -- friends of freedom and democracy. When the US chooses to aid one bad guy over another bad guy, it comes back to bite us eventually. While Israel has made some blunders (handing over Gaza for one) life seemed better under Israel's sane, democratic rule. On the other hand, Ishmael's descendants still act like wild donkeys whenever they get the chance. When they're not fighting common enemies (anyone who's not Arab/Muslim) they're tearing each other apart. It seems the sane thing for peace-loving Middle Easterners to do is embrace Israel as their only safe haven. They're sure not getting it from their fellow Muslims! Posted by A concerned American Christian @ 06/21/2007 04:32 PM CST Call me simple-minded, but I'm having difficulty sorting out the good guys from the bad guys in this situation. Fatah and Hamas have much in common, but are fighting each other. None of these are good guys -- friends of freedom and democracy. When the US chooses to aid one bad guy over another bad guy, it comes back to bite us eventually. In Gaza, life was better under Israel's sane, democratic rule. It seems the best thing for peace-loving Middle Easterners to do is embrace Israel as their only safe haven. They're sure not getting it from their fellow Muslims! Posted by A concerned American Christian @ 06/21/2007 04:38 PM CST As a matter of fact, Israel occupies and colonizes Palestinian territory. The natives defend their home - violently. Even if you think that they should not use violence to defend their homeland, it is comprehensible, and the blame is on Israel's side. The fact that they build settlements in East Jerusalem and the Westbank territory of Palestine shows us that they do not really intend to retreat to the borders of 1967. So there cannot be peace with the Palestinians, and the offers of negotiation to the Palestinians are fake. Israel wants the Palestinians to surrender, therefore they destroyed Fatah - to get Hamas, and now they try to destroy Hamas - to get what? Al Qaida? There are destructive elements in Hamas, but also constructive ones. Why not allow the constructive ones to prevail? And negotiate a complete withdrawal of Israel to the borders of 1967? And some compensation for the landgrab and ethnical cleansing of 1948? Posted by Loewe @ 06/24/2007 04:01 PM CST There are destructive elements in Hamas, but also constructive ones. Why not allow the constructive ones to prevail? And negotiate a complete withdrawal of Israel to the borders of 1967? And some compensation for the landgrab and ethnical cleansing of 1948? Posted by Loewe @ 06/24/2007 04:03 PM CST Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned. |
[Previous entry: "Gaza Implodes: The anti-Altalena of the Hamas"] Main Index [Next entry: "Ten reasons why Fatah collapsed in Gaza"]
ALL PREVIOUS MidEastWeb Middle East LOG ENTRIES
Thank you for visiting MidEastWeb - Middle East.
If you like what you see here, tell others about the MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log - www.mideastweb.org/log/.
Copyright
Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.
Editors can log in by clicking here
|