MideastWeb Middle East Web Log
US President Bush's remarks about "Islamo-Fascism" and "Islamic Fascism" created quite a stir. As usual, most of the commentary has added to the confusion, intentionally or out of ignorance. The storm refuses to go way, so we better tackle it. I will do so in a series of articles.
To set the record straight, what Bush said originally about the subject of Islamo-fascism was:
Subsequently, on August 10, 2006, Bush said, speaking of the arrest of the airline plotters:
Bush did not invent the term Islamo-fascism, which is variously attributed to Christopher Hitchens and others. The first comment, which clearly separated Islam from Islamist terrorist extremists, drew fire from anti-Islam extremists, who insist that all of Islam is the enemy of humanity. Others, however, insisted that Bush was identifying Islam with fascism, despite his clear denial. This stand was reinforced by the second comment, which really appeared to some to brand all of Islam as "Fascist." It was hailed by bigots of the right who misunderstood it that way, with Bush (Finally) Names the Enemy" and At Last! Bush Calls a Spade a Spade!.
By now it is treated as established fact in much of the Middle East that President Bush said that Islam is fascist, but it isn't so.
In Al-Jazeera, Laith Saud wrote recently:
Of course Bush did not do anything of the kind. What doesn't Saud understand about "Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam."?
"Islamic Fascism" does not imply that all Muslims are fascists, any more than "Jewish Philosophy" implies that all Jews are philosophers or "Christian Democrats" could be understood to mean that all Christians are Democrats.
At list one Muslim understood this very well. In Asharq al Awsat of August 14, 2006, Abdul Rahman Al-Rashed wrote:
Nonetheless, the "Islamo-fascist" and "Islamic Fascists" terms seem to have been dropped. A New York Times op-ed and others had a go at attacking the Islamo-Fascism or Islamic Fascism concept. mostly on the basis that it was just "spin" that didn't work To an extent it was spin, but then so are most things. At the time that the "democracies" were fighting actual Fascists, black people were still getting lynched in the southern USA, and one of the "democracies" was Stalinist Russia. So that was "spin" too. When Woodrow Wilson was fighting a war to "make the world safe for democracy," women could not vote in most of the USA, Britain or France.
In fact "Fascism" was coined as a spin term. As Mussolini revealed in a footnote to his article, The Doctrine of Fascism, he coined the term first, and then looked for an ideology:
The principle valid objection to the use of "Islamofascism" or "Islamic Fascism" as a political slogan is that some Muslims object to it. Bush wears two hats. As a politician, he has to win the hearts and minds of American voters. However, as a statesman, he must win the hearts and minds of Muslims, and should not be using terminology that they find objectionable.
In historical and political analysis, we should generally shy away from use of slogans, as these usually prevent thought and tend to label the person who uses them as belonging to a particular political sect and presenting a political opinion rather than considered analysis. "Islamofascism" has generally been a term of right-wing writers unsympathetic to Islam - "neocon" "islamophobes." Of course, the same people who object so vigorously to the term "Islamofascism" often have no problem with slogans like "American imperialism," "Zionism is racism" or "Israeli apartheid state." Different phrases for different fanatics. The question is, to what extent the term "Islamofascism" actually tells us something about the nature of Islamism. That will be explored in subsequent articles.
Articles in this series:
Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000521.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.
Replies: 5 comments
Very nice Ami, seems your articles have been more objective lately. Sounds almost like a transcript for a documentary. If you pitch it right, you may even get someone to fund it.
Posted by OMFG @ 10/06/2006 11:17 PM CST
Ami, Islamic Fascism is an oxymoron. If islam is a religion of peace, than Bush should not use the word islam to describe the terrorists. That is his mistake. Now wether he is doing that on purpose or not is up to him. If I were president, I would have labelled the terrorists as just that, animals, and killers and murderers. I would not have even mentioned the word Islam. That is like saying an "evil christian". There is no such thing. If a person becomes evil then they are not christian anymore. My opinion, I think Bush is racist, and that is why he links Islam with terrorism. There is no link. IF there is a link between the mass religions, it is not terrorism, but it is stupidity, hypocrites, lies, and IGNORANCE. True religion does not promote bad behaviour, therefore one cannot say, AS BUSH SAYS, "Islamic terrorist attacks serve a clear and focused ideology." AGAIN, THE WORD "ISLAMIC" AND THE WORD "TERRORIST" DO NOT FIT TOGETHER.
Posted by john @ 10/09/2006 04:41 PM CST
John, I think in this instance Ami (and Bush) are right and you are wrong.
"Islamic Fascism" is not an oxymoron any more than the term "Christian Fascism" would be to describe Franco or more recent Falangists, or "Hindu Fascism" to describe Shiv Sena in India. If we are talking about a totalitarian regime or system of thought which uses religion as a key element then yoking the two terms together is valid.
It's irrelevant whether the behaviour of the fascists is incompatible with what moderates see as the core values of the religion. As Abdul Rahman al-Rashed says, it's the Islamists who've chosen to associate totalitarianism with Islam, not their critics.
Posted by Spike @ 11/08/2006 03:24 PM CST
Spike, oxymoron works when one fully understands that religion is supposed to be about peace and love and about supposidely doing what god wants. So it is an oxymoron when idiot of any religion claim they are following their religion. They might know it is an oxymoron because they are simply too stupid and dishonest to reflect on their actions. So yes it is an oxymoron to say anything related to terrorism with any form of "TRUE" religion. Bush was not intelligent enough to make the distinction. He should have just said terrorists, killers, murderers, animals, anything, but not say or even mutter religion.
Posted by john @ 11/10/2006 05:34 PM CST
Gee, maybe it's the tendency of these murdering Islamists to declare their admiration for Haj Amin al Husseini, or the popularity in paperback of Mein Kampf in the Arab world. That would tend to make ME call them fascists. Go figure. Call me intolerant for that.
Heaven forbid we should actually LISTEN, or READ what they say on THEIR websites. That might prevent us from actually responding to what, for them, is unlimited warfare, and to US, is another "Police Action".
Arab Islamic Jihadists RELY on the fact WESTERN nuevo intellectuals think so weakly. Their declaration of Jihad after the Cole Bombing went unreported for weeks, simply because the west gave them no credibility.
Here is what I predict. We will grow tired of anything past a TV sitcom timeframe, and leave IRAQ. After turning Iraq into what Afghanistan was, they will launch attacks on the US, as they did before, for the same reasons as before. The american free press will be shocked, as they were before.
Gee, there was a tough prediction.
Posted by Tony @ 12/28/2006 04:48 PM CST
Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.
Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.
Editors can log in by clicking here