MideastWeb Middle East Web Log
Some South Africans are obsessed with the idea of a one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. No doubt this stems from South Africa's own recent experience: throughout the apartheid era, remember, the Afrikaner Nationalists sought to impose separate development, dividing and ruling through a series of tribal mini-states while retaining the bulk of the land for whites; however, the majority desire for a single, undivided country triumphed and the new South Africa came into being.
If it worked in South Africa then it will work for Israelis and Palestinians, so the argument goes. Blame the Jews who will not let it happen.
If only reality was as simple as that. Unfortunately, a one-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians looks more attractive the further away you are from the Middle East and the less you know and understand the history, the fears and the passions.
Logically, of course, a one-state solution is desirable. In this tiny part of the world, with two Semitic peoples living in close proximity, they stand to gain by being together. The problem, however, is that on the ground, most people don't want it. Among the Jewish Israelis who form 80% of the population it's a non-starter, except among a marginal element.
The reasons are straightforward. The whole point of the existence of Israel is to provide a national home for Jews, a sanctuary after many centuries of anti-Semitic savage and deadly persecution. Within the bitter memory of many hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, who are alive today, the world's nations during the 1930s and 1940s refused to admit Europe's Jews - who eventually perished in Nazi gas chambers. The sanctuary was won in 1948 through a vote of the United Nations. There is not the remotest chance that the overwhelming bulk of Jews will yield on this. It underpins all attitudes and actions, both for good and for ill.
There was a time when some Zionists argued for a shared state between Jews and Arabs. That dream largely died in 1929 when an Arab uprising in Palestine led to mass killings of Jews. These days, for Jews, the only relevance of a one-state solution is that it is held up by the left as an awful warning of the demographic consequences of not quitting the West Bank.
Among Palestinians, the official policy enunciated by the Palestinian Authority and President Mahmoud Abbas, and confirmed as the majority view in public opinion surveys, is for a two-state future. They know that Israel is not going to vote itself out of existence so there is no point in pressing for one state. In any event, what attraction could one state offer to Palestinians? To enter into a society where, for the foreseeable future and for historical reasons, Jews would have a lock on the economy, on business, on the universities, medicine, law, education, the army and on art, music and literature?
The Palestinians who persist in demanding a one-state solution are those who want to destroy Israel because it is a Jewish state. That is their declared aim. It's in the Hamas Charter of 1988. It is equally so with Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and the rest.
One South African commentator refers to the recently published book "Seeking Mandela" by the Canadian academics, Heribert Adam and Kogila Moodley. The book is full of detail in examining possible analogies and differences between South Africa and Israel/Palestine and requires careful reading. It cannot be enlisted to support a one-state solution. These are some of the book's key assessments:
In light of strong Jewish feelings against one state, "the idea is indeed unrealistic and utopian." (page 110).
Benjamin Pogrund, Jerusalem
This article was published by the University of Pretoria Centre for International Political Studies (CIPS) and is reproduced here by permission.
Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000482.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.
Replies: 3 comments
Benjamin Pogrundâ€™s article, "One state for Israelis and Palestinians is 'utopian'", has gotten the situation only half right.
I agree that whether it is one Jewish state with Palestinians, one no brand name state of Palestinians and Jews or one Jewish state without Palestinians however that is conceived of, it is utoptian at this stage.
What Pogrund fails to see is that a two state solution is also within or close to a utopian vision of the future.
Pogrund stated in his article.
"Among Palestinians, the official policy enunciated by the Palestinian
Whatever poll Pogrund is referring to, does not accord with the reality that Hamas supports a one Palestinian state solution with no Israel at all and the majority of Palestinians that elected Hamas knew that and supported Hamas at the election. The election itself seems to me the best poll to take the measure of what Palestinian aspirations are.
Secondly, the Prisoner's Declaration that Abbas and Fatah recently signed onto along with Hamas, has moved even the liberal left media such as Britain's Guardian to acknowledge that in that joint declaration, there is no room for Israel to exist.
Pogrund goes on to state:
Posted by Bill Narvey @ 07/05/2006 11:41 PM CST
And continuing the occupation and building settlements is not a utopian solution?
Posted by Micha @ 07/06/2006 02:10 PM CST
There is no way that there can be a one state solution. As each family retains its character in a household and will only accept an outsider for a visit, so a nation wants to express itself according to its basic principles and beliefs.
Posted by Angela WIne @ 08/05/2006 12:09 AM CST
Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.
Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.
Editors can log in by clicking here