MideastWeb Middle East Web Log

log  archives  middle east  maps  history   documents   countries   books   encyclopedia   culture   dialogue   links    timeline   donations 

Search:

Disengagement in Gaza: The unsettling end of orange?

07/21/2005

Orange used to be a popular color in Israel, but apparel store owners say they can't sell anything orange anymore. Orange is the color of the settlers protesting against disengagement. The color was chosen because it was always the color of Gush Katif supposedly, or because it was the color of the Ukrainian peaceful revolution, or because a publicity agent liked it, or all three.

The inevitable battle between Greater Israel fanatics on the one hand and proponents of peace, sanity and pragmatism in Israeli society is all but over.

The settlers and their supporters challenged Sharon to a showdown at high noon. Dodge city was a little community called Kfar Maimon, where Israeli police and the IDF stopped thousands of settlers from entering Gush Katif in order to physically obstruct disengagement. The overwhelming majority of Israelis understands that this was not a legitimate democratic protest. A legitimate democratic protest could have been mounted in Rabin Square. When Peace Now wanted to protest the war in Lebanon, they did not try to send 500,000 people to the Litani river or Beirut in order to disrupt the operation of the IDF.

The showdown has been brewing for many, many years. The reality was always that supporters of Greater Israel at any price were always a minority in Israeli society. They usurped "Zionism" and "patriotism" and harnessed them to a project that didn't have the support of the majority of the Israeli people. Under the umbrella provided by Palestinian extremism and Arab refusal, they built settlements in places that almost nobody in Israel ever thought of as part of Israel, bending or breaking the law to fund their activities out of the taxpayers' money.

The great march of the settlers on Gaza, which the Greater Israel people hoped would prove that their cause has the support of the majority of Israelis, fizzled. The settlers tried to usurp the law. Sharon, in the person of the police, and the settlers, faced-off in the Negev. The settlers put away their guns. There could be no other outcome. In the Knesset too, a motion to postpone the disengagement was voted down by a large margin. Israel has decided: Gaza is not Israel. It is the wrong place to make a stand for Zionism and Jewish rights in our land, because it is not our land, and because we recognize that we are not the only people here with rights and claims.

The battle with the settlers is not just about real-estate. It is a battle for the content and purpose of Israeli society of life, and the future of the Zionist movement. The settlers and their supporters were intent on coopting Zionism and patriotism, and transforming it from a democratic national revival movement into a racist theocratic monstrosity that seeks to evict people from their homes in the name of "God-given rights," a Jewish Hamas. They wanted to turn Israeli society into the demonized image of Zionism that has been painted by anti-Zionists, and they haven't given up yet.

The most famous casualty of the struggle for sanity versus "Greater Israel" was Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin, murdered during a real democratic protest against violence. In retrospect it is obvious that after the conlcusion of the Oslo Declaration of Principles, Israel had no business in Gaza and no reason to invest in settlements that were bound to be removed one day and that served only to cause friction with Palestinians.

Unfortunately, internal political considerations made it impossible for Rabin to remove the settlements in Gaza. Ariel Sharon would have been the first to raise the banner of a then-powerful opposition. The end of this crazy adventure had to wait until Sharon was in power and could not oppose himself, just as peace with Egypt had to wait until Menachem Begin was in power and could no longer yell "Not one centimeter" at every proposal for peace.

It would have been much better to evacuate the settlements then, and to save the money wasted in supporting and defending these settlements, not to mention the lives that were lost, for worthier causes and for issues that really threaten national existence. Had Israel evacuated at least Gush Katif in 1994 or in the course of the Oslo negotiations, Israeli earnestness about the peace process would have gained credibility both in the world and among the Palestinians. It could have been done peacefully, with a bilateral agreement, and it could have strengthened Palestinian moderates. Now it is too late. Of course, Palestinian extremists are claiming that it is their terror that drove Israel out of Gaza. However it would be insane to pour good money after bad just to take up the juvenile dare of the Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

The process of disengagement, and the firm rejection of settler calls for violence should have a salutary effect on Israeli self-image and on our image abroad. Propagandists have projected a racist stereotype of an Israel populated by wild-eyed religious fanatics from Brooklyn, and an IDF staffed with racist religious warmongers. A memorable bit of fiction by the notorious Jack Kelley that was passed off as news related how an Israeli settler put on his knit kippah before gunning down innocent Palestinians. That inflammatory nonsense should have been put to rest by the events of the past week, for everyone except the most dogmatic readers of axisoflogic and counterpunch. With few exceptions, the soldiers with knit kippoth, like all their comrades, obeyed their orders and kept the settlers out of Gaza. At the forefront of these soliders was a man whose whom and family are in Gush Katif. Israel proved to itself and to doubters around that world that it is an orderly and democratic society, not a rabble governed by irresponsible lunatics.

Despite announced plans for a further march next week, it seems that the crucial battle is just about won, but that does not mean that the struggle with supporters of Greater Israel is over. If there is to be peace, Israel will need to give up most of the West Bank - historical Judea and Samaria. The settlers and their supporters will certainly be back, in strength, when the time comes. No doubt there will be many more Israelis willing to rally to settlements in "Judea" and "Samaria" which are well anchored in Jewish tradition as part of "the land." They will be reinforced by the bitter sacrifice that they made in giving up the settlements of Gaza. Very probably, their cause will be helped by Palestinian extremists who will provide the justification for maintaining the occupation so as not to "reward terror." However, Israel can't keep shooting itself in the foot in order to avoid "rewarding terror."

Ami Isseroff

PS - About Internet insanity - What is "Googletestad?" Find out here -
Googletestad -
http://www.zionism-israel.com/googletestad.htm

If you like this post - click to Reddit!
add to del.icio.usAdd to digg - digg it

Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000365.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to mew-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.

by Moderator @ 01:32 PM CST [Link]

NEWS

Middle East e-Zine

Midde East News

Opinion Digest

Late Updates

REFERENCE

Middle East Glossary

Middle East Maps

Middle East Books

Middle East Documents

Israel-Palestine History

Israel-Palestine Timeline

Middle East Countries

Middle East Economy

Middle East Population

Middle East Health

Zionism History

Palestinian Parties

Palestinian Refugees

Peace Plans

Water

Middle East

  

Blog Links

OneVoice - Israeli-Palestinian Peace Blog

Bravo411 -Info Freedom

Israel News

Oceanguy

Michael Brenner

Dutchblog Israel

Dutch - IMO (Israel & Midden-Oosten) Blog (NL)

GulfReporter

Israpundit

Alas, a Blog

Little Green Footballs

Blue Truth

Fresno Zionism

Reut Blog

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Blog

Simply Jews: Judaism and Israel

Jeff Weintraub - Commentaries and Controversies

Vital Perspective

ZioNation

Meretz USA Weblog

normblog

MIDEAST observer

On the Contrary

Blogger News Network- BNN

Google Sex Maps

Demediacratic Nation

Realistic Dove

Tulip - Israeli-Palestinian Trade Union Assoc.

On the Face

Israel Palestjnen (Dutch)

Middle East Analysis

Israel: Like This, As If

Middle East Analysis

Mid_East Journal

Z-Word Blog

Dvar Dea

SEO for Everyone


Web Sites & Pages

Israeli-Palestinian Procon

End Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: One Voice

Democratiya

ATFP- American Task Force on Palestine

Americans For Peace Now

Shalom Achshav

Chicago Peace Now

Nemashim

Peacechild Israel

Bridges of Peace

PEACE Watch

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Z-Word

Zionism

Zionism and Israel

Zionism and Israel on the Web

Israel - Palestina:Midden-Oosten Conflict + Zionisme

IsraŽl in de Media

Euston Manifesto

New Year Peace

Jew

Christian Zionism

Jew Hate

Space Shuttle Blog

Israel News Magazine

SEO


My Ecosystem Details
International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Link 2 us
We link 2 U.
MidEastWeb- Middle East News & Views
MidEastWeb is not responsible for the content of linked Web sites


Replies: 7 comments

orange was also the official color of "balad" party
and of... "new profile", feminist movement for the de-militarization
of israeli society.

Posted by native @ 07/21/2005 07:13 PM CST

A good analysis, nicely phrased, that speaks about good news, makes its reading a feast. Let me enjoy again the sweet sound of the core : "Israel proved to itself, and to doubters around that world, that it is an orderly and democratic society, not a rabble governed by irresponsible lunatics."

Posted by Aleph @ 07/21/2005 08:14 PM CST

You write: "Unfortunately, internal political considerations made it impossible for Rabin to remove the settlements in Gaza."

In fact, to remove settlements was not a priority of Rabin. Otherwise, he would have terminated the one in Hebron after the slaughter at the Tomb of teh Patriarch.

Instead, the victims were punished by several months of curfew.

Best
Paul
Belgium

Posted by Paul @ 07/21/2005 08:15 PM CST

Hi,
Paul wrote:
"In fact, to remove settlements was not a priority of Rabin. Otherwise, he would have terminated the one in Hebron "
There is no doubt that if he had tried to remove that settlement, Rabin would have had a very brief political career. Hebron and Jerusalem and like mom's apple pie in this neck of the woods.

Hebron is both a national and religious symbol - the burial place of the patriarchs. The Hebron settlement is on Jewish land. Hebron was also the home of a Jewish community that lived there for about 400 years until it was ethnically cleansed. In justice, there is no way to deny the right of those people to be there. The fact that they are fanatics and make trouble with their Arab neighbors is beside the point. Politically it was impossible for Rabin to give up Hebron because of the stink that would be put up by the right. Even Bibi could not withdraw from Hebron. Not even Sharon can do that. Maybe it would require Kahana, but he is dead.

Many in Israel assumed that Rabin would evacuate Gush Katif as part of the FRDs. Peres and Nethanyahu did not have the national prestige to do it. It was assumed also that Israel would be able to keep the northern settlements in Gaza.

Aleph wrote:
"Let me enjoy again the sweet sound of the core : "Israel proved to itself, and to doubters around that world, that it is an orderly and democratic society, not a rabble governed by irresponsible lunatics."
***
Thanks for the compliments above. I tremble lest I be proven wrong next week. I always believed that this orderly process is what had to happen based on past history and what I hope is my understanding of Israeli society. However, nobody can control the actions of a single lunatic, as Yigal Amir and Goldstein proved. What is important is what happens after such events - if they create chaos or if the system takes over as it does in civilized countries.

Cheers,

Ami

Posted by Ami Isseroff @ 07/22/2005 04:07 AM CST

Photos from the orange protest against gaza pullout are on www.pbase.com/yalop/gaza (choose "all" to see more photos)

Posted by yaldor @ 07/22/2005 08:19 AM CST

Aleph wrote:
"Israel proved to itself, and to doubters around that world, that it is an orderly and democratic society, not a rabble governed by irresponsible lunatics."
Maybe all they proved was that it is a society governed by secret police, with orders directly from the top, to break ribs in order to silence the opposition. Maybe the opposition had something to say that's worth listening to.

Posted by rg @ 07/28/2005 02:03 PM CST

The inevitable battle between Greater Israel fanatics on the one hand and proponents of peace, sanity and pragmatism in Israeli society is all but over.

Gosh, I thought the issues where what is best for Israel's survival and what puts Israel in more danger. Maybe something about a democratic decision by the entire society. So people who would want Israel to get some agreement before a withdrawal are not sane or pragmatic or for peace? Sounds like a pretty judgmental, biased and PLO style perspective to me.
Sincerely,
Lou

Posted by Lou @ 08/05/2005 10:58 PM CST


Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.

Powered By Greymatter

[Previous entry: "Disengagement diary: Wayward taxi"] Main Index [Next entry: "Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in Gaza"]

ALL PREVIOUS MidEastWeb Middle East LOG ENTRIES

Thank you for visiting MidEastWeb - Middle East.
If you like what you see here, tell others about the MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log - www.mideastweb.org/log/.

Contact Us

Copyright

Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.

Editors can log in by clicking here

Technorati Profile

RSS FeedRSS feed Add to Amphetadesk Add to Amphetadesk

USA Credit Card - Donate to MidEastWeb  On-Line - Help us live and grow