MideastWeb Middle East Web Log
According to Time Magazine and other publications, the 9/11 Commission has uncovered startling new facts about Iran's ties with al-Qaida, facts that put Tehran uncomfortably close to the 9/11 plot.
Is it possible that the CIA, in its eagerness to please a President unshakeably fixated on a mythical alliance between al-Qaida and Iraq, overlooked a matter of the highest consequence? Did the U.S., in effect, go to war with the wrong country?
The Time report reads, in part,
A senior U.S. official told TIME that the Commission has uncovered evidence suggesting that between eight and ten of the 14 "muscle" hijackers--that is, those involved in gaining control of the four 9/11 aircraft and subduing the crew and passengers--passed through Iran in the period from October 2000 to February 2001. Sources also tell TIME that Commission investigators found that Iran had a history of allowing al-Qaeda members to enter and exit Iran across the Afghan border. This practice dated back to October 2000, with Iranian officials issuing specific instructions to their border guards--in some cases not to put stamps in the passports of al-Qaeda personnel--and otherwise not harass them and to facilitate their travel across the frontier. The report does not, however, offer evidence that Iran was aware of the plans for the 9/11 attacks.Only some of this is new. We were warned. Richard Clarke told us, earlier this year. From pages 283-84 of Against All Enemies:
When the Bush administration talked about Iraq as a nation that supported terrorism, including al Qaeda, and was developing weapons of mass destruction, those comments perfectly suited Iran, not Iraq. It was Tehran that had funded and directed Hezbollah since its inception. ... While the "ties" and "links" between Saddam and al Qaeda were minimal, al Qaeda regularly used Iranian territory for transit and sanctuary prior to September 11. Al Qaeda's Egyptian brance, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, operated openly in Tehran. It is no coincidence that many of the al Qaeda management team, or Shura Council, moved across the border into Iran after U.S. forces finally invaded Afghanistan.But the President of the United States simply wasn't interested in this line of inquiry. From page 32:
Later, on the evening of the 12th [of September 2001], I left the [White House] Video Conferencing Center and there, wandering alone around the Situation Room, was the President. He looked like he wanted something to do. He grabbed a few of us and closed the door to the conference room. "Look," he told us, "I know you have a lot to do and all... but I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this. See if he's linked in any way..."In the days and weeks to come, we will undoubtedly learn what bits of intelligence were collected when, and not only what we knew, but what we should have known on the basis of information available at a given time. It will take longer to learn the price of one man's private obsession.
Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000282.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to email@example.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.
by Analyst @ 09:44 AM CST [Link]
Replies: 6 comments
Do you bet the others went in and out of Afghanistan through Pakistan?
They din't have much other choice with the Alliance in the North.
Iran and Pakistan had no reason to impede movements from friends of the government of their neighbouring country.
Posted by Paul @ 07/21/2004 12:00 AM CST
If Iran is the more likely target, isn't it interesting that there are now US Forces on three sides of it?
Posted by Midwest Charlie @ 07/21/2004 06:52 PM CST
Paul is mistaken. Iran supported the Northern Alliance against the Taliban, who massacred Afghanistan's Shi'ites, who in turn took refuge in Iran. At one point, the Taliban killed a group of Iranian diplomats, sparking a crisis between Iran and Pakistan.
The Iranians helped an anti-American and anti-Saudi terrorist organization move clandestinely through their country, before and after 9/11. We are talking about sneaking them through in hopes of evading notice.
For what it's worth, I'm no fan of Pakistan, either.
Posted by Analyst @ 07/22/2004 05:10 AM CST
They didn't have enough invading Irak. Now Bush fellows are trying to find an argument to invade Iran?
Posted by Rafael @ 07/22/2004 07:15 AM CST
Why should the White house and it's allies always find a way of hitting Islamic states and take away it's wealth and as well as spreading their deseases there? can't they see?
Posted by ziki @ 08/05/2004 11:06 AM CST
Al Qaeda is mostly privately sponsored, but of course there were some pre-9/11 ties. I.e., Al Qaeda --> Taliban --> Pakistan. Al Qaeda --> Saudi intelligence. Bin Laden --> United Arab Emirates. Before that, bin Laden --> Sudan. Egyptian Islamic Jihad of course is from Egypt and later merged with al Qaeda, though the Egyptian government was no great fan. One of the hijackers was Lebanese. Osama's ancestors are from Yemen. Etc. etc. If you want to find ties, you can find them. Most of them aren't jaw-dropping. And most of them definitely aren't in Iraq.
Posted by drt @ 08/09/2004 12:09 PM CST
Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.
Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.
Editors can log in by clicking here