MideastWeb Middle East Web Log

log  archives  middle east  maps  history   documents   countries   books   encyclopedia   culture   dialogue   links    timeline   donations 

Search:

Iraq - continued welcome for coalition?

05/15/2004

In recent statements, senior US officials insist that the US would leave Iraq if asked to do so by the Iraqi government that will take power at the end of June, or by an elected government in early 2005. Indeed, if they recognize the sovereignty of the Iraqi government, the US would have no choice other than to obey its wishes, but one suspects that those statements were made only because US officials are confident that no Iraqi government would ask them to leave. Like so many other US judgements about Iraq, that one may be quite mistaken.

The first to raise the issue in congressional testimony was Marc Grossman, Undersecretary of State for political affairs. However, Lt. General Walter L. Sharp of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said that U.S.-led multinational forces were authorized under U.N. resolutions to operate in Iraq at least until a permanent constitutional government was elected in 2005. Grossman repeatedly insisted that it was unlikely that the interim government would ask the US to leave.

The statements were soon repeated by both Paul Bremer and Secretary of State Colin Powell. Powell said:


"I have no doubt the new government will welcome our presence and am losing no sleep over whether they will ask us to stay."

Likewise, Paul Bremer, who runs the US military administration in Iraq said:


"If the provisional government asks us to leave, we will leave..."

"I don't think that will happen, but obviously we don't stay in countries where we're not welcome."

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw concurred, that, "were the government that takes over to ask us to leave, we would leave."

Of course, whenever foreign troops are stationed in a country, it must be done either as the result of defeat in war and occupation, or with the "consent" of the government. Sometimes, as in the case of West Germany after World War II, this consent represents the will of the government and the people. Ohter times, as in the case of East Germany, Hungary in 1956, Czechoslovakia in 1968 and Lebanon at present, the consent is forced from a hand-picked government by an occupying power. The US and Britain want very much to say they have ended the occupation, but clearly, they cannot withdraw their troops from Iraq. They are sure that the Iraqi government will not ask them to do so, but that is far from certain. What is almost certain is that in any event, after a new government is elected in January 2005, there will be a lot of pressure on the US to withdraw, if the elections are free.

There is no basis for the confidence of American and British officials that they will be asked to stay in Iraq, unless they are certain they are going to "stack the decks" and ensure that a friendly and unrepresentative government takes over at the end of June. White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters Friday that the Iraqi people still want help from the United States and coalition forces to provide security. How does McClellan know?

In a recent polls, 57 to 60% of Iraqis said they want coalition troops to leave, and 71% see the coalition as occupiers. The reasons cited repeatedly include excessive use of force and lack of regard for civilian lives by US soldiers. The continuing flood of revelations about prisoner interrogation, which came after these polls, can only turn Iraqi opinion further against the US and its allies.


The Iraqi government that takes power after June 30 will be crafted by UN envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, rather than hand-picked by the US. However, even the most pro-US government would have difficulty standing in the way of popular pressure to end the occupation, and it is hard to see how a government that realistically represents Iraqi political parties could acquiesce in the occupation. The Shi'a represent over 60% of Iraqis, and their religious and political leaders don't want the occupation and can't afford to be seen cooperating with the Coalition. Sunni Iraqis who benefitted from Saddam Hussein's regime certainly don't want the occupation to continue. Of course, any government that may come to power begins to be associated with the Coalition from the day it comes to power. We can no longer delude ourselves that this association can be beneficial to them in any way. They will be viewed as collaborators, somewhat like the Vichy government of France, and this guilt of "collaboration" will become worse with each day that passes. So on the one hand, a new Iraqi government will have an incentive to ask the coalition to leave immediately, but if they wait, they will lose the option to ask the coalition to leave, because they will be dependent on coalition troops to defend their government. Any politician who is associated with a government that supports the occupation will have a tough time getting support in any future elections.


For these reasons, it is hard to understand why US officials say that the Iraqi government won't ask them to leave. It is even more frightening perhaps, to consider that they really believe it, and haven't seriously taken into account the possibility that an Iraqi government will do what the Iraqi people want and ask the US and its allies to leave. What will you do then, Mr. Bush?

Ami Isseroff

If you like this post - click to Reddit!
add to del.icio.usAdd to digg - digg it

Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000258.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to mew-subscribe@yahoogroups.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.

by Moderator @ 01:33 PM CST [Link]

NEWS

Middle East e-Zine

Midde East News

Opinion Digest

Late Updates

REFERENCE

Middle East Glossary

Middle East Maps

Middle East Books

Middle East Documents

Israel-Palestine History

Israel-Palestine Timeline

Middle East Countries

Middle East Economy

Middle East Population

Middle East Health

Zionism History

Palestinian Parties

Palestinian Refugees

Peace Plans

Water

Middle East

  

Blog Links

OneVoice - Israeli-Palestinian Peace Blog

Bravo411 -Info Freedom

Israel News

Oceanguy

Michael Brenner

Dutchblog Israel

Dutch - IMO (Israel & Midden-Oosten) Blog (NL)

GulfReporter

Israpundit

Alas, a Blog

Little Green Footballs

Blue Truth

Fresno Zionism

Reut Blog

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Blog

Simply Jews: Judaism and Israel

Jeff Weintraub - Commentaries and Controversies

Vital Perspective

ZioNation

Meretz USA Weblog

normblog

MIDEAST observer

On the Contrary

Blogger News Network- BNN

Google Sex Maps

Demediacratic Nation

Realistic Dove

Tulip - Israeli-Palestinian Trade Union Assoc.

On the Face

Israel Palestjnen (Dutch)

Middle East Analysis

Israel: Like This, As If

Middle East Analysis

Mid_East Journal

Z-Word Blog

Dvar Dea

SEO for Everyone


Web Sites & Pages

Israeli-Palestinian Procon

End Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: One Voice

Democratiya

ATFP- American Task Force on Palestine

Americans For Peace Now

Shalom Achshav

Chicago Peace Now

Nemashim

Peacechild Israel

Bridges of Peace

PEACE Watch

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Z-Word

Zionism

Zionism and Israel

Zionism and Israel on the Web

Israel - Palestina:Midden-Oosten Conflict + Zionisme

IsraŽl in de Media

Euston Manifesto

New Year Peace

Jew

Christian Zionism

Jew Hate

Space Shuttle Blog

Israel News Magazine

SEO


My Ecosystem Details
International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Link 2 us
We link 2 U.
MidEastWeb- Middle East News & Views
MidEastWeb is not responsible for the content of linked Web sites


Replies: 3 comments

The reason that President Bush is in Iraq is because the Lubavitche Rebbe said that he should be there.
President Bush should listen to all that the Lubavitche Rebbe has to say concerning Iraq. He should know who and what this war is about, that his winning must be complete. Then he will know peace.

Posted by charlie bottons @ 05/19/2004 03:43 AM CST

I thought your website said "We provide balanced and complete information, ...".
I'm confused. This article seems to have a little synicism and bias contained in it.
In addition, I have always supported this war, but I am beginning to hope they do ask us to leave. Not only do we not want to be where we are not wanted, we also don't want to lose more of our lives for people whose ignorance won't let them see the light in front of their eyes.

Posted by D Owen @ 05/19/2004 10:05 PM CST

The coalitions are not ready to leave before their objectives are done, like in germany after 1945, they will exploit the Iraqi`s wealth - Petroleum - up to when they will be sure than no anather saddam hussein will be on power, because there was no clear reason why should they remove sadda regime, it remains clear that there is no reason for them to stay and appoint leaders for Iraqies, except only Petroleum Products

Posted by African boy @ 06/10/2004 02:28 PM CST


Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.

Powered By Greymatter

[Previous entry: "Hamas: Reports of its death are greatly exaggerated"] Main Index [Next entry: "The Israeli Peace Movement is Back"]

ALL PREVIOUS MidEastWeb Middle East LOG ENTRIES

Thank you for visiting MidEastWeb - Middle East.
If you like what you see here, tell others about the MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log - www.mideastweb.org/log/.

Contact Us

Copyright

Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.

Editors can log in by clicking here

Technorati Profile

RSS FeedRSS feed Add to Amphetadesk Add to Amphetadesk

USA Credit Card - Donate to MidEastWeb  On-Line - Help us live and grow