MideastWeb Middle East Web Log
Suicide bombing in Islam? Just say "No" argues Amina from Lebanon.
There is a need for every believing Muslim to 'strive', or engage in spiritual Jihad, to understand the word and will of God and to live accordingly. Failure to engage in that Jihad makes our responses in times of crises mere reflexes based on what we are told (traditions) rather than the result of rational (yes, I believe one can be rational in his/her approach to understanding the written word of God) and independent thinking that is grounded in evidence from the Qur'an, the most authoritative religious book for Muslims.
Mixing politics and religion
In Sura 2, verse 79, the Qur'an reads:
To be specific, the Palestinian struggle has been enmeshed with the Islamic religion by both sides: the Zionists and their defenders and the Palestinians and their defenders, and consequently both Islam as religion and the Palestinian struggle emerged tainted and vilified. This is the price of making religion subservient to one's political interests. Muslims in general, and Arabs and Palestinians in specific, unfortunately share the responsibility, along with Zionists, in this vilification. I even dare to say that Muslims have provided the Zionists with ammunition to use against them and discredit the Palestinian struggle and Islam as a religion of the one true God in the propaganda war.
I will not discuss here the legitimacy of the methods used by Palestinians to defend their basic human rights. I will leave the issue of the legitimacy of Palestinian suicide bombing as a method of warfare to those who can argue for it or against it from the perspective of international law and basic human rights. What I am interested in here, however, is to disentangle some of the webs that have been woven around the issue of suicide bombing and Islam.
Common religious knowledge tells us that Palestinian suicide bombers are 'shuhada' or 'martyrs'. By killing those whom they consider to be enemies of God, Jews or Israelis, and sacrificing themselves in the process, they obtain the status of 'martyrs' or 'shuhada' and go to heaven to accept their reward. When this 'common knowledge' is cross-referenced with the Koran, the concept of 'martyrdom' becomes less clear-cut, if not flimsy. To start with, Muslims are asked to fight those who fight them (2:19) but are also asked somewhere else to go beyond the principle of an eye for an eye and to forgive their oppressors (Qur'an 5:45). This may seem quite contradictory as a command from God, except that those people that the early Muslim believers were fighting against in self defence were specifically the polytheists of the Arab peninsula. Jews, by contrast, were to be dealt with differently according to the Qur'an.
To start with, most of the Qur'anic verses (cited by apologists of suicide bombing as 'evidence') refer to "those killed" (kutila) and not "who kill" (katala) in the cause of God (Qur'an 2:154, 3:157, 3:169, ) . So, a suicide bomber in that respect may actually not qualify for a reward in the afterlife (at least not unequivocally), because such a person would be killing, rather than just be killed for his faith in God!
This still does not mean that Muslims are not ordered in the Qur'an to "fight" and "kill" (kital) in the cause of God (3: 195, 4:74). Quite to the contrary! However, it is this condition ("in the cause of God") which is the most problematic part when justifying suicide bombing on religious grounds. Muslim believers who fight (their oppressors) and strive with their person and belongings in order to be "witnesses" of God and live their faith openly are indeed shuhada (plural of shaheed) according to the Qur'an. This cannot be said of Palestinian suicide bombers unless they are fighting and being killed by Israelis because of their faith in God. I truly do not believe that this is the case. Palestinians are not attacked, oppressed, thrown out of Palestine, etc. because of their faith. Christian Palestinians were treated in the same way, and all Palestinians could be Buddhists or atheists for that matter and they would still have been persecuted by the Israelis. In other words, the struggle is not a religious one, but purely a political/nationalist one. Since Palestinians are not oppressed because of their religion, but because of their land, which has nothing to do with God or belief in God as no piece of land should, their "fighting" against Israelis cannot be "rewarded" by God in that sense. Actually, a verse from the Qur'an is clear in its categorical forbidding of suicide. Speaking to believers, the Qur'an says:
In further defence of the Qur'anic sanctioning of suicide bombing, some have argued that the concept of 'witness' , the way I understand it from the Qur'an , that is. as living openly one's faith in God),has a different word for it in Arabic: 'shahed' and not 'shaheed'. In other words, they claim that 'witness' means 'shahed' and 'martyr' means 'shaheed'. I looked up verses in the Qur'an that contain the word 'shahed'. If their argument is correct, I should not find the word 'shaheed' in those verses that speak about 'witnessing', since 'shaheed' according to them means 'martyr' . I stopped at this verse (4:41):
In this verse, the word for 'witness' in Arabic is not 'shahed' as these apologists argue it should be, but shaheed', that is: 'martyr', according to their 'dictionary'. Since God is speaking about all the prophets that God sent to spread his message, including Mohammad (pbuh) who was sent to the Arabs of the peninsula, Mohammad (pbuh) was definitely a 'witness' in spreading the word of God, but could not have been a 'martyr', that is,. sacrificed through death, especially that he died of natural causes! Again, the distinction between 'shahed' and 'shaheed' becomes almost impossible to accept when, in Sura 2 verse 282, in the context of writing contracts, two men are needed to 'act as witnesses' (the word used is the plural of 'shaheed', and not 'shahed'). Since I believe those men have to be alive for their testimony to be valid in a court of law, 'shaheed' in reference to them cannot mean 'martyr' but 'witness'!
If still in doubt, Sura 48, verse 28 refers to God as 'shaheed'! obviously that word does not mean 'martyr', not according to the Qur'an in any case. Indeed, in the eyes of God, we are all potential 'shuhada' (witnesses and not martyrs), simply by believing in God and his apostles, and we shall have our reward and our light (57:19).
The supposedly two different terms, one being 'shahed' and meaning 'witness' and one being 'shaheed' and meaning 'martyr' are, unless I am proven incorrect, actually two words meaning the same thing, 'the one who sees, pledges, or attests, or witnesses', though with variable intensity. One of the most authoritative Arab dictionaries, Muheet al Muheet by Boutros al Bustani, explains that 'shahed' is the one who sees and 'shaheed' is one whose testimony is trustworthy. Muslims thus can readily argue, based on the Qur'an, that being killed for ones faith is an extreme case of 'witnessing'. However, when some Muslim theologians 'stretch' that concept of 'witness' to include those who simultaneously kill their enemy, instead of forgiving them, and commit suicide, a crime in the eyes of God, they should, out of fear of God, make it also known that this is their own interpretation of the word of God, that they could be wrong about this interpretation, and that they should pray to God day and night to forgive them in case they were wrong. God is all merciful, all compassionate!
As a final note, I don't advance these views about suicide bombing and Islam in order to be "politically correct," as some might think. Being a Lebanese Muslim Sunni woman, I know too well the meaning of challenging religious orthodoxy in an environment that often literally 'eliminates' dissent. I and others like me may be politically correct in the USA or Western Europe, but are indeed politically very incorrect in the Middle East. In any case, I don't care for being politically correct as much as I want and strive to be 'religiously' correct in the eyes of God. If some 'traditions' and interpretations, including Hadith, tell me things that contradict what is unequivocal in the Qur'an, I know as a Muslim that the Qur'an is the highest authority for Muslims. A case in point is the hadith oft quoted by religious clerics to encourage suicide bombers. According to that hadith, Palestinian 'Shuhada' or 'martyrs,' accepting the interpretation of the apologists, not only get 72 virgins but also get to guarantee heaven for their entire family. The above-mentioned verse (35:18) clearly states the opposite, saying that each individual is strictly responsible for his/her own acts on earth (see also 53:38 and 60:3).
I truly urge well meaning Muslims involved in the Palestinian struggle not to sacrifice God's truth in the cause of Palestine. This would be an unacceptable price to pay for believers in God. True, putting religion in the service of politics might entail some 'earthly rewards' and political gains, but most probably will end up depriving us of the greater, more enduring reward in heaven (8:28):
Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000188.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to email@example.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.
by Amina @ 10:51 AM CST [Link]
Replies: 5 comments
Excellent and Well Argued Piece.
I would however add that the Qur'an in my humble understanding does empower muslims (lower case, those who strive to live in submission to God) to defend themselves against those who fight them for their faith in God but also to protect their homes against those who wish to drive them out without just cause (see Qur'an Sura al-Mumtahina 60, 8-9)
Thank you, Amina.
Posted by A. Rashied Omar @ 02/18/2004 12:53 PM CST
I only wish Thank you Amina.
Posted by Israel Bonan @ 02/18/2004 03:00 PM CST
You article offers clear, Qur'anic based argument. I am elated to see this type of Qur'anic logic being shared with both Muslim and non-Muslim thinkers.
Posted by Qasim Abdul-Tawwab @ 02/18/2004 08:04 PM CST
Although other scholars are writing their own "readings" of the Qur'an, and although I actually like your "reading" very much indeed, I think there are two big problems with your argument, and that others might criticize it from one or the other angle. Both arise because there is a cumulative weight of scholarship and commentary on this question and you do not refer to any of this scholarship or popular commentary on a) the Jews b) the question of jihad and shahada and their linkage. A) is a different than B)
The point you make in A) is 1) that Jews do not HAVE to be fought so far as the Qur'an is concerned and then 2) the conflict in Palestine is not religious, it is territorial-nationalism that produces two people fighting over the same land. Both are true, yet, the historical information on fighting with the Jews (going back to Medina) and quite a lot of negative hadith, have been used by some, including Islamists to attack the Jews (not just Zionists) in a really very racist discourse. Even in the Qur'an, there is the assertion that the Jews and the Christians have distorted, or failed to follow the Prophetic messages given to them by God - see 5:20. Then add to this the modern conflict, and Muslim responses to 2) - that Palestine is the waqf of Muslims (or simply Jerusalem) that Muslims have a duty to fight Jews, and the Israeli response and effort to say that Muslims and Islamic culture causes people to hate them.
I think you have to acknowledge the way these other ideas have "covered over" the "pure" source of the Qur'an - and w/o denying that there was fighting between the Jewish tribes of Yathrib and the Prophet who regarded them as perfidious (though not ALL Jews).
The second problem or set of problems has to do with the literature on jiihad and shahada. Here, it doesn't make too much sense, in my opinion, to argue that those who die through jihad, shouldn't be called shuhada (shahid or shahida) because they ARE. Arabic is like that, there are so many words with more than one meaning, and with these historical influences that shape meaning. See R. Peters, Jihad for some of the reasons that the word "shahid" is used -- sources from Abu Hureira to Malik ibn Anas and so on. The double meaning comes from sentences about those who will "witness" the death of martyrs, that they bear testimony to the message of the Prophet. Anyway, I don't really see the point in telling people that they should NOT use the term shahid, since this is the term that they DO use, a mujahid being a living fighter and a shahid, a dead one -- and there is this history and literature about the topic and connection of martyrdom to belief, especially for the Shi`a
A more convincing point would be the fact that suicide bombers murder innocent people (Qaradawi says they aren't innocent, all Jews will grow up and serve in the armed forces)
Also relevant - see
Best wishes to you
Posted by Sherifa @ 02/19/2004 10:54 PM CST
Masha'Allah, You have written a very interesting article.
Posted by Omar H.Altalib @ 02/19/2004 11:37 PM CST
Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.
Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.
Editors can log in by clicking here