MideastWeb Middle East Web Log
Hanan Ashrawi got the Sydney peace prize and gave what sounded like a fine speech. Her voice of reason was very welcome at last after the long torrent of one-sided invective that usually issues from spokespersons for either side. The award of the prize to Ashrawi was sharply criticized by right-wing Zionist organizations (eg, the ZOA, as quoted in http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/69) who insisted that Ashrawi is a spokesperson for 'terror' and unworthy of a peace prize. Therefore, it is important to examine both the speech and Ashrawi's record.
As we have seen everything in the Middle East before, including fine speeches, it remains to be determined whether the speech was as fine as it sounds or not, and whether or not Ashrawi meant what she said. A speech and a program that are compatible with peace, must allow both Palestinians and Israelis the fundamental right to self-deterimination in their own state, because this is the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Does Hanan Ashrawi recognize the right of the Jews to their own state? It is not as clear as it might seem at first glance.
Regarding the refugee problem, Ashrawi stated, for example,
Accordingly, we need to determine what is Hanan Ashrawi's concept of "international law and requirements of Justice." If her idea of justice requires for example, that Palestinian refugees be repatriated to Israel, creating an Arab majority in Israel and putting an end to the Jewish state, then this speech is not about peace.
Hanan Ashrawi is on record as supporting the "right" of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes in what is now Israel.
The International Progress Organization (I.P.O.) has joined thousands of Palestinians and their supporters from all over the globe in a Petition for the Right of Return and has declared its affiliation with the recently established Council for Palestinian Restitution and Repatriation (CPRR). The Petition sponsored by the CPRR states "that every Palestinian has a legitimate, individual right to absolute restitution of all his or her property and the right to return to his or her original home." Members of the Advisory Board of the Council for Palestinian Restitution and Repatriation are, among others, Haidar Abdul Shafi, Hanan Ashrawi, Noam Chomsky, and Ibrahim Abu Lughod.
In this speech, Hanan Ashrawi condemns violence, "Unprecedented violence is eradicating previous
It should go without saying that a person getting a peace prize should be against violence, but in the Middle East that is not necessarily the case, so Hanan Ashrawi is to be lauded for her stand. Contrary to the claims of some, Ashrawi has condemned suicide bombing and violence on several occasions. She wrote:
In December 2001, she wrote:
Why and when did we allow a few from our midst to interpret Israeli military attacks on innocent Palestinian lives as license to do the same to their civilians? Where are those voices and forces that should have stood up for the sanctity of innocent lives (ours and theirs), instead of allowing the horror of our own suffering to silence us?...
In a 2002 interview, she was asked, "Do you think that suicide bombing is a legitimate form of resistance?"
Indeed, Hanan Ashrawi was among the sponsors of a petition by Palestinians asking for an end to suicide bombings. The petition read in part:
Some might question how any actions against civilians could be "military actions," but in the context of Palestinian reality it was brave and forthright stand, and it did somewhat reduce Palestinian support for murderous attacks on civilians.
However, Ashrawi was not always so outspoken against violence. For example, at the start of the Intifada, in November 2000, she said:
Asked about the Hamas group in 1993, Ashrawi said, "I don't think of Hamas as a terrorist group. We coordinate politically...the people we know and talk to are not terrorists." (UPI, April 30, 1993)
The verdict has to be that the jury is still out on Hanan Ashrawi. Like many on both sides in the Israel-Palestine conflict, she has probably traveled a certain distance from an extreme position to one that makes reconciliation more possible, and views it as legitimate. Perhaps Ashrawi should not be judged by statements made in 1993 and perhaps not even by statements made at the start of the current violence, just as Yitzhak Rabin should not be judged by statements made in the 1980s about Palestinians. On the other hand, it was certainly disappointing that when the violence broke out in September 2000, moderate Palestinians like Ms Ashrawi were either silent or condoned it. If non-violence does not have friends in need in Palestine, then in fact it has no friends at all. Ashrawi, like many other Palestinians is not quite ready to give up right of return.
Ashrawi wisely said in accepting the reward, "Neither side can lay claim to a monopoly of pain and suffering, in the same way as it cannot claim exclusivity of narrative and legitimacy. " However, in fact all of her perception of the reasons for the conflict and its resultion, still claim an exclusivity of narrative and legitimacy, and disallow any possibility of wrongdoing at any time by the Palestinians.
She said, "Territoriality will give way to demography and the issue will become one of democracy, with Zionism forced to re-examine its basic premises." Ashrawi has recognized only half the truth. Certainly Palestinian nationalism, and her own Fatah movement, which still claims all of Israel from the river to the sea in its constitution, will need to reexamine its basic premises as well, if there is to be peace. Why, if Ashrawi has accepted the Jewish state, does she believe that 'territoriality will give way to demography?" Does she mean that eventually, the Arabs of Israel will constitute a majority, their numbers bolstered by Palestinian refugees, and then the Jewish people would be denied the right to self determination? That is not a formula for peace of course.
In summary, Hanan Ashrawi is no saint of peace, but perhaps she is not the devil depicted by right wing Zionist groups.
In times of violence and victimisation, unilateralism and militarism, and ideological
fundamentalism, the world is most in need of voices and forces of sanity, reason and moral
responsibility -- the genuine building blocks of peace.
As we witness attempts to impose a simplistic view of a Manichean universe, polarisation and
The just resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can be addressed in its proper context as
The logic of peace, formulated painstakingly (and painfully) as the substance of Palestinian-Israeli
The notion that a nation can be brought to its knees by the use of unbridled violence, or that the
Conversely, the emergence of the bizarre concept of a "balance of terror" has reinforced the
On both the Palestinian and Israeli sides, the no-holds-barred mind-set has taken over as a
Related to that is the notion that a people under occupation will eventually reconcile themselves to
For the conflict to be resolved, its causes must be identified and tackled, and grievances and fears
And what about third-party intervention? An instrument such as the road map of the quartet powers --
Such interventions can also be destructive if they are motivated by special agendas, if they
Islamic fundamentalists and regressive brands of Arab nationalists have, ironically, joined forces
A Palestinian-Israeli solution remains simple and attainable. Of course, the two-state solution is
Within the two-state paradigm, Jerusalem, both East and West, can become an open city and the shared
The Palestinian refugees must be granted historical, legal, moral and human recognition and redress
This is an edited extract from the 2003 Sydney Peace Prize lecture delivered last night by Hanan
Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000104.htm where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Distributed by MEW Newslist. Subscribe by e-mail to email@example.com. Please forward by email with this notice and link to and cite this article. Other uses by permission.
Replies: 2 comments
the only reason Ashrawi has ever given for criticizing suicide bombers is that they have not helped to further the palestinian goal which is the elimination of Israel as a Jewish state. the main difference between her and other Jew haters is that she is better educated and is able to couch her vitriol in more soothing words.
Posted by mike levine @ 11/10/2003 08:29 PM CST
While Hanan Ashrawi is a very eloquent speaker and intelligent woman, from reading some of her speeches, I don't see her as someone to receive a peace prize but rather as a skilled spokesperson for the Palestinian cause. Seems to me there are many others on both the Israeli & Palestinian side who have stood more for peace...and risked more than Ms. Ashrawi...and more deserving of a peace prize.
Posted by Karen @ 11/13/2003 03:39 AM CST
Please do not leave notes for MidEastWeb editors here. Hyperlinks are not displayed. We may delete or abridge comments that are longer than 250 words, or consist entirely of material copied from other sources, and we shall delete comments with obscene or racist content or commercial advertisements. Comments should adhere to Mideastweb Guidelines . IPs of offenders will be banned.
Editors' contributions are copyright by the authors and MidEastWeb for Coexistence RA.
Please link to main article pages and tell your friends about MidEastWeb. Do not copy MidEastWeb materials to your Web Site. That is a violation of our copyright. Click for copyright policy.
MidEastWeb and the editors are not responsible for content of visitors' comments.
Please report any comments that are offensive or racist.
Editors can log in by clicking here